AQT PINE vs IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 Specs, Pricing & Performance [2026]
Quick Verdict
IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 leads on 2Q gate fidelity (99.70%). IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 offers more physical qubits (36 qubits).
Specification Comparison
| Metric | AQT PINE | IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Qubits | 24 | 36 ✓ |
| Technology | Trapped Ion | Trapped Ion |
| 2Q Gate Fidelity | 99.50% | 99.70% ✓ |
| 1Q Gate Fidelity | 99.93% | 99.95% ✓ |
| Readout Fidelity | 99.80% | 99.85% ✓ |
| Quantum Volume | 128 | 65,536 ✓ |
| CLOPS | 100 | 200 ✓ |
| T1 (Relaxation) | 2000 ms ✓ | 1000 ms |
| T2 (Dephasing) | 20 ms ✓ | 10 ms |
| 1Q Gate Time | 20 µs ✓ | 135 µs |
| 2Q Gate Time | 400 µs ✓ | 600 µs |
| Connectivity | All-to-All (deg 23) | All-to-All (deg 35) |
| Max Circuit Depth | 300 | 500 ✓ |
| Max Shots | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| Dynamic Circuits | No | Yes |
| Error Mitigation | No | Available |
| Cloud Platforms | 3 platforms | 4 platforms |
Green bold values with a checkmark indicate the better result for each metric.
Pricing Comparison
Example: 10-qubit, 50-depth circuit, 1,000 shots — estimated cost on cheapest platform: AQT PINE: $10.30 vs IonQ Forte Enterprise 1: $30.30
Trapped Ion AQT PINE
| Platform | Price | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Best Amazon Braket | $0.0100/shot | Available |
| Azure Quantum | $0.0120/shot | Available |
| qBraid | $0.0100/shot | Available |
Trapped Ion IonQ Forte Enterprise 1
| Platform | Price | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Best Amazon Braket | $0.0300/shot | Available |
| Azure Quantum | $0.000970/AQT | Available |
| IonQ Quantum Cloud | $0.000970/AQT | Available |
| qBraid | $0.0300/shot | Available |
Use Case Recommendations
Higher 2Q gate fidelity (99.70%) means fewer errors in VQE/UCCSD circuits.
More qubits (36 qubits) allows encoding larger problem instances.
Higher CLOPS (200) means faster circuit execution for high-repetition workloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between AQT PINE and IonQ Forte Enterprise 1?
IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 leads on 2Q gate fidelity (99.70%). IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 offers more physical qubits (36 qubits).
Which is better for quantum chemistry, AQT PINE or IonQ Forte Enterprise 1?
For quantum chemistry simulations (VQE, UCCSD), IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 is preferred due to its higher 2Q gate fidelity (99.70% vs 99.50%). Higher gate fidelity directly reduces circuit error rates in chemistry algorithms.
How do the prices compare between AQT PINE and IonQ Forte Enterprise 1?
AQT PINE is available from $0.0100/shot on Amazon Braket. IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 is available from $0.0300/shot on Amazon Braket. Note that pricing models differ — per-shot pricing is directly comparable while AQT and HQC models depend on circuit structure.
Which QPU has better connectivity, AQT PINE or IonQ Forte Enterprise 1?
Both AQT PINE and IonQ Forte Enterprise 1 use All-to-All connectivity. The effective connectivity degree is 23 for AQT PINE and 35 for IonQ Forte Enterprise 1.
What are the coherence times for AQT PINE vs IonQ Forte Enterprise 1?
AQT PINE: T1=2000 ms, T2=20 ms. IonQ Forte Enterprise 1: T1=1000 ms, T2=10 ms. AQT PINE has longer coherence times, which generally allows for deeper circuits before errors accumulate.
Explore individual profiles