!

Quick Verdict

Microsoft Majorana 1 uses Topological while Rigetti Ankaa-3 uses Superconducting technology. Rigetti Ankaa-3 offers more physical qubits (84 qubits).

Specification Comparison

Metric Microsoft Majorana 1 Rigetti Ankaa-3
Physical Qubits 8 84 ✓
Technology Topological Superconducting
2Q Gate Fidelity 99.50% ✓
1Q Gate Fidelity 99.90% ✓
Readout Fidelity 98.50% ✓
Quantum Volume 128 ✓
CLOPS 15,000 ✓
T1 (Relaxation) 80 µs ✓
T2 (Dephasing) 60 µs ✓
1Q Gate Time 40 ns ✓
2Q Gate Time 80 ns ✓
Connectivity Linear (deg 2) Grid (deg 4)
Max Circuit Depth 2,000 ✓
Max Shots 100,000 ✓
Dynamic Circuits No No
Error Mitigation No Available
Cloud Platforms 0 platforms 5 platforms

Green bold values with a checkmark indicate the better result for each metric.

Pricing Comparison

Example: 10-qubit, 50-depth circuit, 1,000 shots — estimated cost on cheapest platform: Microsoft Majorana 1: N/A vs Rigetti Ankaa-3: $1.00

Topological Microsoft Majorana 1

No cloud access data available.

Superconducting Rigetti Ankaa-3

Platform Price Status
Amazon Braket
$0.000900/shot Available
Azure Quantum
$0.000970/shot Available
Best Rigetti QCS
$0.000750/shot Available
qBraid
$0.000900/shot Available
Strangeworks
$0.000900/shot Available

Topological vs Superconducting: Technology Tradeoffs

Topological (used by Microsoft Majorana 1)
Advantage
Topological protection could dramatically reduce the error rate per physical qubit, potentially enabling fault-tolerant quantum computing with far fewer physical qubits than other approaches.
Challenge
The technology is still in early experimental stages. Majorana zero modes have only recently been demonstrated in simplified devices. Implementing two-qubit gates between topological qubits and scaling the architecture remain unsolved engineering challenges.
Gate Speed
Not yet characterized at scale
Fidelity
Not yet characterized at scale
Learn more →
Superconducting (used by Rigetti Ankaa-3)
Advantage
Fast gate speeds (tens to hundreds of nanoseconds), mature fabrication technology using standard semiconductor processes, and strong industry investment make this the most commercially advanced platform.
Challenge
Requires dilution refrigerators operating near absolute zero (~15 mK), leading to large physical footprints and high infrastructure costs. Qubits are sensitive to noise, limiting coherence times to microseconds-to-milliseconds range.
Gate Speed
10–700 ns per gate
Fidelity
99.5–99.9% for 2-qubit gates
Learn more →

Use Case Recommendations

Quantum Chemistry Rigetti Ankaa-3

Higher 2Q gate fidelity (99.50%) means fewer errors in VQE/UCCSD circuits.

Large-scale Optimization Rigetti Ankaa-3

More qubits (84 qubits) allows encoding larger problem instances.

Finance / Monte Carlo Rigetti Ankaa-3

Higher CLOPS (15,000) means faster circuit execution for high-repetition workloads.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between Microsoft Majorana 1 and Rigetti Ankaa-3?

Microsoft Majorana 1 uses Topological while Rigetti Ankaa-3 uses Superconducting technology. Rigetti Ankaa-3 offers more physical qubits (84 qubits). These QPUs use fundamentally different qubit technologies: Topological vs Superconducting.

Which is better for quantum chemistry, Microsoft Majorana 1 or Rigetti Ankaa-3?

For quantum chemistry, gate fidelity is the most critical metric. Compare the 2Q gate fidelity figures in the spec table above to determine which QPU is better suited for your chemistry workload.

How do the prices compare between Microsoft Majorana 1 and Rigetti Ankaa-3?

Microsoft Majorana 1 is available from no public cloud access. Rigetti Ankaa-3 is available from $0.000750/shot on Rigetti QCS. Note that pricing models differ — per-shot pricing is directly comparable while AQT and HQC models depend on circuit structure.

Which QPU has better connectivity, Microsoft Majorana 1 or Rigetti Ankaa-3?

Microsoft Majorana 1 uses Linear connectivity (degree 2) while Rigetti Ankaa-3 uses Grid connectivity (degree 4).

What are the coherence times for Microsoft Majorana 1 vs Rigetti Ankaa-3?

Rigetti Ankaa-3: T1=80 µs, T2=60 µs.